Teach Edge
HomeHow It WorksPricing
FAQsContactBlog
Key Stage 3

Key Stage 3 comes to TeachEdge: feedback shaped around your teaching

Key Stage 3 is now available in Quick Mark and Class Marking, with feedback shaped by each teacher's subject, class and learning priorities.

22 September 2026•5 min read•
Key Stage 3Teacher FeedbackFormative AssessmentAi MarkingQuick MarkClass Marking

Quick Summary

  • •Teachers can now use TeachEdge for Key Stage 3 work in Quick Mark and Class Marking.
  • •Assessment instructions can reflect the subject, year group, learning focus and success criteria.
  • •Teachers can choose between marks with feedback and feedback only.
  • •Saved assessment approaches make it easier to reuse and adapt instructions for recurring tasks.

Key Stage 3 is now available in TeachEdge, in both Quick Mark and Class Marking.

Schools have been asking about using TeachEdge with younger students, and I could see why. There is a great deal of work in Years 7, 8 and 9 that would benefit from individual feedback. Finding the time to give that feedback across several classes is the familiar difficulty.

The question for me was how to make it useful for the way teachers actually assess at KS3.

TeachEdge's GCSE and A-level marking is built around particular qualifications, question types and assessment requirements. At KS3, the starting point is often much more specific to your teaching: what have you taught this class, what are they practising, and what would you like them to improve?

That is the thinking behind this addition.

You decide what matters in the task

You might give a Year 7 English class a descriptive writing task because you want them to practise creating atmosphere. A few weeks later, you might use a similar task to focus on sentence variety or paragraphing.

The work may look similar, but the feedback you want will be different.

With the new KS3 option, you can give TeachEdge the subject and year group, then describe how you would like the work assessed. You can explain the focus of the task, set out relevant success criteria and say what sort of feedback would be useful.

That gives you room to be quite precise. You might want attention paid to the use of evidence in a history paragraph, the explanation of a process in science, or a particular stage of a calculation in maths.

The teacher's instructions provide the context for the feedback.

Marks when they are useful

You can choose marks with feedback, or feedback only.

Sometimes a mark is useful. You may have a short assessment with clear criteria and want students to see how well they have met them.

For other tasks, you may want their attention on one thing they have done well and one thing they should work on next. The feedback-only option lets you do that without attaching a numerical score.

From my own time in the classroom, I know how much thought goes into deciding what to comment on. There may be several things a student could improve, but you still have to decide what will help them most at that point.

That is the sort of decision I wanted teachers to be able to express in TeachEdge.

A simple example

Take this short English task:

Write one paragraph describing a stormy night. Create a sense of tension using vivid vocabulary and at least one simile or metaphor.

A teacher could give TeachEdge instructions along these lines:

This is a Year 7 class practising descriptive writing. Focus on atmosphere and effective language choices. Identify one thing the student has done well and give one specific next step. Keep the language straightforward. Give feedback only, without a mark.

For a response that creates a clear stormy setting but relies on familiar phrases, an illustrative next step might be:

Choose one familiar phrase, such as "a huge black blanket", and replace it with a more precise image of your own. Think about how the clouds move or what they hide.

That gives the student something concrete to try. It also gives the teacher a straightforward follow-up: ask students to revise one sentence using their feedback.

The same principle applies across subjects. Start with what you want students to learn, then make the feedback useful for that purpose.

Save an approach you want to use again

You can also save your assessment instructions as a named approach.

Once you have worked out how you want feedback given on a particular kind of task, you can return to those instructions and adapt them for the next piece of work.

That should be useful for recurring activities, where the topic changes but the skills you are looking for remain similar.

KS3 is available through Quick Mark and Class Marking. Within Class Marking, teachers can review and edit feedback before releasing it to students.

Try it with something you already teach

My suggestion is to start with a task you know well.

Choose a short piece of work, explain what you have been teaching and describe what you want the feedback to focus on. Then read the result with your knowledge of the class in mind.

I'm particularly interested in how schools use this flexibility. KS3 covers a wide range of subjects, ages and approaches to assessment. Giving teachers room to bring that context into TeachEdge was central to the design.

I hope it makes it easier to give students useful feedback on everyday work, with a next step they can understand and put into practice.

.

Related Posts

The Part of the AI Marking Debate We Keep Missing

The AI marking debate is often framed as a choice between slow but personal human feedback and fast but impersonal automation. The more useful model is different: AI drafts first, and the teacher reviews, adjusts and approves what the student actually sees.

Ai In EducationAi MarkingTeacher Feedback

What 200,000 marking decisions taught me about how we mark essays

After two years building an AI marking platform used by 400+ teachers, I've noticed consistent patterns in how marks get adjusted, where judgement calls cluster, and what actually helps pupils improve. The biggest surprise wasn't about accuracy. It was about feedback and time.

Ai MarkingEssay FeedbackTeacher Workload

What Makes TeachEdge Different from Other AI Marking Tools?

TeachEdge connects exam-specific AI marking with class assignments, teacher review, student feedback and progress tracking. Explore its three marking routes and the wider assessment workflow.

Ai MarkingAssessmentStudent Feedback

Ready to transform your marking workflow?

View Pricing•Contact Us

Product

  • How it works
  • Pricing
  • Compare TeachEdge to other AI Marking Tools

Resources

  • Blog
  • FAQs
  • Copyright FAQs

Company

  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy policy
  • Data security
  • Child-Friendly Privacy Policy
  • Terms

TeachEdge is a web-based education application used by teachers in UK secondary schools. Disclaimer: TeachEdge.ai is independent of, and not endorsed by, any examination board.

TeachEdge.ai is a UK-built platform that helps secondary teachers give better marking and feedback on essays and longer exam-style questions, without the copy-and-paste admin. It supports Class Marking for full class assignment workflows, Quick Mark for individual responses, and Exam Script Marking for scanned student responses.

As an AI teaching tool, TeachEdge supports AI assessment and AI feedback with teacher control. Teachers can set tasks for a class, students can submit through their own portal, or teachers can upload scanned responses through Exam Script Marking. TeachEdge produces draft marks and feedback calibrated to the relevant exam board. Manual release is the default in Class Marking; teachers can enable automatic release.

TeachEdge supports assessment across Economics, Business, Accounting, History, Psychology, Sociology, Law, Religious Studies, Philosophy, Politics, Geography, Classics, Criminology, Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Environmental Science, Mathematics, Further Mathematics, Computer Science, English Language, English Literature, English Language & Literature, Media Studies, Film Studies, Music, French, Spanish, Health & Social Care, and Food & Nutrition. Available qualifications, exam boards and question types vary by subject. The aim is simple: reduce marking load while making feedback clearer, more consistent, and more useful for students to act on — practical AI for teachers that fits normal classroom routines.

Teach Edge also includes personalised tutoring. Teachers set the topic and students work through a one-to-one conversation that starts with a short baseline check and then proceeds in a Socratic, scaffolded way. Crucially, teachers can review full conversations and see summaries of student understanding or misconceptions, including class-level patterns, so tutoring feeds directly back into teaching — another way Teach Edge supports AI feedback that teachers can trust and act on.

© 2026 TeachEdge.ai. All rights reserved.